# Driver-based financial model

Examples: Finance

A three-statement model with unit economics and base, bull, and bear scenarios.

- **Real today:** ulpi can ship this kind of deliverable now.
- **Evidence:** Judged

## Company brief

> Build me a financial model for a $29/month SaaS so I can see runway and unit economics.

Produced by the Finance Analyst

- **Budget cap:** $45.00
- **Cost / verified outcome:** $6.30

## Evidence

- **Judged:** Drivers are consistent and scenarios reconcile
  A separated judge grades the model against the acceptance spec. ulpi does not ship a deterministic spreadsheet checker, so this close is honestly Judged — the only mechanical fact on the page is its content hash.

## Acceptance spec

Passes if the three statements tie, each scenario flows from explicit drivers, and the runway and unit-economics figures are internally consistent.

## Why it matters

An honest model says when it was judged, not checked. The content hash makes the artifact tamper-evident; the judgement is held to an explicit bar instead of a fake green checkmark.

A finance teammate builds a driver-based P&L, runway, and CAC/LTV view with base, bull, and bear cases. There is no shipped formula-checking verifier, so quality is graded against a written acceptance spec rather than asserted as mechanically proven.