Driver-based financial model
A three-statement model with unit economics and base, bull, and bear scenarios.
Driver-based financial model — brief, deliverable, and evidence
Build me a financial model for a $29/month SaaS so I can see runway and unit economics.
Budget cap
$45.00
Cost / outcome
$6.30
Evidence
- Drivers are consistent and scenarios reconcileA separated judge grades the model against the acceptance spec. ulpi does not ship a deterministic spreadsheet checker, so this close is honestly Judged — the only mechanical fact on the page is its content hash.
Acceptance specPasses if the three statements tie, each scenario flows from explicit drivers, and the runway and unit-economics figures are internally consistent.
Content hashsha256:4450aa4d…e897
An honest model says when it was judged, not checked. The content hash makes the artifact tamper-evident; the judgement is held to an explicit bar instead of a fake green checkmark.
A finance teammate builds a driver-based P&L, runway, and CAC/LTV view with base, bull, and bear cases. There is no shipped formula-checking verifier, so quality is graded against a written acceptance spec rather than asserted as mechanically proven.
How this was made
An org chart of teammates
A coordinated team — Finance Analyst — each owns its part of the deliverable.
Coordinated, evidenced work
Teammates run in a sandbox and hand back content-addressed WorkProducts — each closed with its honest evidence label.
Evidence
Spend is metered against a hard cap, so every deliverable carries what it actually cost to evidence.
- Cost / outcome$6.30
Build the team that ships your Driver-based financial model
Pick the deliverable closest to what you need, then watch your AI team produce it inside the budget you set.